data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4eb75/4eb75e3193de3405ec90a7cbab2f43b14fca0467" alt=""
Writing two weeks ago about Mabel Dodge Luhan (Archives:January, 2011) and last week about Pamela Colman Smith made me think more about the role of Alfred Stieglitz (1864-1946) in that early Modern era.
Based on receiving many a quizzical look when I mention Stieglitz, I'd have to say that unless you are a historian of art and photography, his fame seems to be diminishing. It's hard to know why since he was so good at his profession. Furthermore, it was Stieglitz who was largely responsible for the promotion of photography as an art form.
You see, photography was to the late 19th and early 20th centuries what digital art is to the 21st century. The question was and is: Is it an art form or manipulation of something that was invented by someone else? Stiegltiz answered the question by placing photography alongside paintings in his New York galleries.
Stieglitz elevated photography to a accepted medium of fine art.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edfb7/edfb7ada610497703028e86e6d5b55b49507a757" alt=""
Insofar as his own talent in concerned, here are a sampling of photos taken by him. (Please click on image to enlarge.) It seems that these alone would be cause to remember him. (The hands are those of his wife, Georgia O' Keeffe.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa72c/aa72c72e6e4e0106d52a0748b0edc6a301df6e0e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8e72/f8e72fc35cc493ed8704b7218225005587a27109" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d12ac/d12ac9f64c8497bd75c429d085ee5d42e94d85a7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20474/20474486cc65d7138ce7ad92da599f71b96e8125" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97bf9/97bf9e84ce779ae349c917395e2601e30e5084a9" alt=""